Let me illustrate with the following scenario. One guy at work calls another guy at work Poopsie, as a nickname. The guy being called Poopsie says, “Sir, please do not call me that. I don’t like it.”
“Okay, Poopsie,” says the name caller.
Right there, the name call has broken the Non Aggression Principle. So if the person being called Poopsie, then strikes the name caller, he is defending himself, and has not broken the Non Aggression Principle.
This is the hypothesis, that if people blatantly disregard a reasonable request, they are violating the NAP.
I think I want to dig into this more. Probably post on Reddit. But did want to get this out there now, and then follow up more when I have time.
No comments:
Post a Comment